CIESIELSKI v. OHIO
383 U.S. 411 (1966)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

CIESIELSKI v. OHIO, 383 U.S. 411 (1966)

383 U.S. 411

CIESIELSKI v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 920.
Decided March 7, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Theodore R. Saker for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 411, 412

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/411/case.html">383 U.S. 411</a> (1966) 383 U.S. 411 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 411 (1966)

383 U.S. 411

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 868.
Decided March 7, 1966.

245 F. Supp. 561, 570, affirmed.

James W. Wrape, Robert E. Joyner and Reagan Sayers for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.; Paul F. Sullivan for Kenosha Auto Transport Corp., and Donald W. Smith for Commercial Carriers, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.