CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, 383 U.S. 271 (1966)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, 383 U.S. 271 (1966)

383 U.S. 271

CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 941.
Decided February 28, 1966.*

251 F. Supp. 998, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 942, Alexander v. Faubus, Governor of Arkansas, et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Fines F. Batchelor, Jr., for appellant in No. 941. W. B. Brady for appellant in No. 942.

Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, Farrell E. Faubus, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack L. Lessenberry for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 383 U.S. 271, 272




U.S. Supreme Court

CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, 383 U.S. 271 (1966)

383 U.S. 271

CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 941.
Decided February 28, 1966.*

251 F. Supp. 998, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 942, Alexander v. Faubus, Governor of Arkansas, et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Fines F. Batchelor, Jr., for appellant in No. 941. W. B. Brady for appellant in No. 942.

Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, Farrell E. Faubus, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack L. Lessenberry for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 383 U.S. 271, 272

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.