HEMPHILL v. WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION, 383 U.S. 103 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

HEMPHILL v. WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION, 383 U.S. 103 (1966) 383 U.S. 103

HEMPHILL ET UX., DBA CAPITOL SKATELAND v. WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 812.
Decided February 21, 1966.

65 Wash. 2d 889, 400 P.2d 297, appeal dismissed.

Joel A. C. Rindal for appellants.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, Timothy R. Malone, Assistant Attorney General, and H. Eugene Quinn, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/103/case.html">383 U.S. 103</a> (1966) 383 U.S. 103 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON, 383 U.S. 103 (1966) 383 U.S. 103

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 12, ET AL. v. DEACON.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 841.
Decided February 21, 1966.

236 Cal. App. 2d 302, 46 Cal. Rptr. 11, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Charles K. Hackler for appellants.

Appellee pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 103, 104




U.S. Supreme Court

HEMPHILL v. WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION, 383 U.S. 103 (1966) 383 U.S. 103

HEMPHILL ET UX., DBA CAPITOL SKATELAND v. WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 812.
Decided February 21, 1966.

65 Wash. 2d 889, 400 P.2d 297, appeal dismissed.

Joel A. C. Rindal for appellants.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, Timothy R. Malone, Assistant Attorney General, and H. Eugene Quinn, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/103/case.html">383 U.S. 103</a> (1966) 383 U.S. 103 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON, 383 U.S. 103 (1966) 383 U.S. 103

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 12, ET AL. v. DEACON.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 841.
Decided February 21, 1966.

236 Cal. App. 2d 302, 46 Cal. Rptr. 11, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Charles K. Hackler for appellants.

Appellee pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 103, 104

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.