McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966) 383 U.S. 102

McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. No. 1036, Misc.
Decided February 21, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 102, 103

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/102/case.html">383 U.S. 102</a> (1966) 383 U.S. 102 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 102 (1966) 383 U.S. 102

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
KENTUCKY. No. 792.
Decided February 21, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 337, affirmed.

H. G. Breetz, W. L. Grubbs, M. D. Jones and Joseph L. Lenihan for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., and Robert E. Hogan for appellee Railway Labor Executives' Association.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966) 383 U.S. 102

McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. No. 1036, Misc.
Decided February 21, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 102, 103

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/102/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/383/102/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/383/102/">383 U.S. 102</a></a></a> (1966) 383 U.S. 102 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 102 (1966) 383 U.S. 102

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
KENTUCKY. No. 792.
Decided February 21, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 337, affirmed.

H. G. Breetz, W. L. Grubbs, M. D. Jones and Joseph L. Lenihan for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., and Robert E. Hogan for appellee Railway Labor Executives' Association.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.