U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO., 382 U.S. 900 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. , 382 U.S. 900 (1965)

382 U.S. 900

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1965

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.

Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. , 382 U.S. 900 (1965)

 382 U.S. 900

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1965

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.

Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.