U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO., 382 U.S. 900 (1965)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. , 382 U.S. 900 (1965)382 U.S. 900
UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440.
Supreme Court of the United States
November 8, 1965
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.
Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of
Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for
oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah
Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]
Opinions
v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440. Supreme Court of the United States November 8, 1965 Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States. Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. , 382 U.S. 900 (1965) 382 U.S. 900 UNITED STATES, petitioner,v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440. Supreme Court of the United States November 8, 1965 Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States. Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]
Search This Case
