TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 9 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 9 (1965)

382 U.S. 9

TRAVIA ET AL. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 191.
Decided October 11, 1965.

Affirmed.

Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[For concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]

Page 382 U.S. 9, 10

 


U.S. Supreme Court

TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 9 (1965)

382 U.S. 9

TRAVIA ET AL. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 191.
Decided October 11, 1965.

Affirmed.

Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[For concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]

Page 382 U.S. 9, 10

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.