TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 9 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 9 (1965) 382 U.S. 9TRAVIA ET AL. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF
STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 191.
Decided October 11, 1965.
Affirmed.
Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[For concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]
U.S. Supreme Court
TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 9 (1965) 382 U.S. 9 TRAVIA ET AL. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 191.
Decided October 11, 1965.
Affirmed. Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [For concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.] Page 382 U.S. 9, 10
