BECK v. McLEOD, 382 U.S. 454 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
BECK v. McLEOD, 382 U.S. 454 (1966)
382 U.S. 454 BECK v. McLEOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 770.
Decided January 31, 1966.
240 F. Supp. 708, affirmed.
Samuel C. Craven for appellant.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. WILSON & CO., INC., 382 U.S. 454 (1966)
382 U.S. 454 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. WILSON & CO., INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 56.
Decided January 31, 1966.
335 F.2d 788, remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States et al.
Howard J. Trienens for respondents American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.
PER CURIAM.
The joint motion of counsel to remand is granted and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in order to permit the entry of a decree of restitution in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
U.S. Supreme Court
BECK v. McLEOD, 382 U.S. 454 (1966)
382 U.S. 454 BECK v. McLEOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 770.
Decided January 31, 1966.
240 F. Supp. 708, affirmed.
Samuel C. Craven for appellant.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. WILSON & CO., INC., 382 U.S. 454 (1966)
382 U.S. 454 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. WILSON & CO., INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 56.
Decided January 31, 1966.
335 F.2d 788, remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States et al.
Howard J. Trienens for respondents American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.
PER CURIAM.
The joint motion of counsel to remand is granted and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in order to permit the entry of a decree of restitution in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
