CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, 382 U.S. 422 (1966)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, 382 U.S. 422 (1966) 382 U.S. 422

CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY
RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

ILLINOIS. No. 751.
Decided January 24, 1966.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 752, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., also on appeal from the same court.

242 F. Supp. 414, affirmed.

Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson for appellants in No. 751. Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 752.

Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrz, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H. Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 382 U.S. 422, 423

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, 382 U.S. 422 (1966) 382 U.S. 422 CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY
RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

ILLINOIS. No. 751.
Decided January 24, 1966.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 752, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., also on appeal from the same court.

242 F. Supp. 414, affirmed.

Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson for appellants in No. 751. Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 752.

Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrz, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H. Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 382 U.S. 422, 423