AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 373 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 373 (1966)

382 U.S. 373

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 662.
Decided January 17, 1966.

242 F. Supp. 597, affirmed.

Peter T. Beardsley, Richard R. Sigmon and Harry C. Ames, Jr., for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. William M. Moloney, Hugh B. Cox, William H. Allen and James A. Bistline for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al. to be added as parties appellee is granted.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 382 U.S. 373, 374




U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 373 (1966)

382 U.S. 373

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 662.
Decided January 17, 1966.

242 F. Supp. 597, affirmed.

Peter T. Beardsley, Richard R. Sigmon and Harry C. Ames, Jr., for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. William M. Moloney, Hugh B. Cox, William H. Allen and James A. Bistline for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al. to be added as parties appellee is granted.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 382 U.S. 373, 374

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.