NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM'N, 382 U.S. 370 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM'N, 382 U.S. 370 (1966)

382 U.S. 370

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF
CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 676.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Thormund A. Miller, Jeremiah C. Waterman and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Hector Anninos for appellee.

Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the City of San Rafael, California, et al. for leave to be named parties appellee is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/370/case.html">382 U.S. 370</a> (1966) 382 U.S. 370 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK, 382 U.S. 370 (1966)

382 U.S. 370

SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 732.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Arnold Schildhaus, appellant, pro se.

John G. Bonomi and Michael Franck for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 370, 371




U.S. Supreme Court

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM'N, 382 U.S. 370 (1966)

382 U.S. 370

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF
CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 676.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Thormund A. Miller, Jeremiah C. Waterman and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Hector Anninos for appellee.

Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the City of San Rafael, California, et al. for leave to be named parties appellee is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/370/case.html">382 U.S. 370</a> (1966) 382 U.S. 370 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK, 382 U.S. 370 (1966)

382 U.S. 370

SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 732.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Arnold Schildhaus, appellant, pro se.

John G. Bonomi and Michael Franck for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 370, 371

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.