NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 NEHRING v. GERRITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 614.
Decided December 6, 1965.
31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N.E.2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.
233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.
Leon M. Cooper for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 NEHRING v. GERRITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 614.
Decided December 6, 1965.
31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N.E.2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 382 U.S. 202, 203
U.S. Supreme Court
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.
233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.
Leon M. Cooper for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
