NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202NEHRING v. GERRITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 614.
Decided December 6, 1965.
31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N.E.2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.
233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.
Leon M. Cooper for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 NEHRING v. GERRITY.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 614.
Decided December 6, 1965.
31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N.E.2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 382 U.S. 202, 203
382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202 CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.
233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed. Leon M. Cooper for appellants. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
