MARCHEV v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, 382 U.S. 201 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
MARCHEV v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 MARCHEV ET UX. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 571.
Decided December 6, 1965.
44 N. J. 412, 209 A.2d 145, appeal dismissed.
James T. Dowd for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, ASSESSOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 567.
Decided December 6, 1965.
149 W. Va. 485, 141 S.E.2d 314, appeal dismissed.
Joseph A. Blundon for appellant.
C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MARCHEV v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 MARCHEV ET UX. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 571.
Decided December 6, 1965.
44 N. J. 412, 209 A.2d 145, appeal dismissed.
James T. Dowd for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 382 U.S. 201, 202
U.S. Supreme Court
GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, ASSESSOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 567.
Decided December 6, 1965.
149 W. Va. 485, 141 S.E.2d 314, appeal dismissed.
Joseph A. Blundon for appellant.
C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
