MARCHEV v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, 382 U.S. 201 (1965)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

MARCHEV v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201

MARCHEV ET UX. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 571.
Decided December 6, 1965.

44 N. J. 412, 209 A.2d 145, appeal dismissed.

James T. Dowd for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 201, 202


382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201

GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, ASSESSOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 567.
Decided December 6, 1965.

149 W. Va. 485, 141 S.E.2d 314, appeal dismissed.

Joseph A. Blundon for appellant.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

MARCHEV v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 MARCHEV ET UX. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 571.
Decided December 6, 1965.

44 N. J. 412, 209 A.2d 145, appeal dismissed.

James T. Dowd for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 201, 202


382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, 382 U.S. 201 (1965) 382 U.S. 201 GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, ASSESSOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 567.
Decided December 6, 1965.

149 W. Va. 485, 141 S.E.2d 314, appeal dismissed.

Joseph A. Blundon for appellant.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.