UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO., 382 U.S. 197 (1965)

Argued: November 15, 1965
Decided: December 6, 1965
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO., 382 U.S. 197 (1965) 382 U.S. 197

UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MICHIGAN. No. 8.
Argued November 15, 1965.
Decided December 6, 1965.

 227 F. Supp. 791, affirmed.

Assistant Attorney General Turner argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Frank Goodman and Robert B. Hummel.

Dennis G. Lyons and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were Paul A. Porter, William L. McGovern, John A. Blair, S. K. McCune and W. Walter Braham, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 382 U.S. 197, 198

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO., 382 U.S. 197 (1965) 382 U.S. 197 UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MICHIGAN. No. 8.
Argued November 15, 1965.
Decided December 6, 1965.

 227 F. Supp. 791, affirmed.

Assistant Attorney General Turner argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Frank Goodman and Robert B. Hummel.

Dennis G. Lyons and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were Paul A. Porter, William L. McGovern, John A. Blair, S. K. McCune and W. Walter Braham, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 382 U.S. 197, 198