HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP.,
382 U.S. 160 (1965)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP., 382 U.S. 160 (1965)
382 U.S. 160 HODGES ET AL. v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT.
No. 548.
Decided November 22, 1965.
174 So.2d 565, appeal dismissed.
George C. Dayton and Joe A. McClain for appellants.
Richard W. Barrett and J. Lewis Hall for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, 382 U.S. 160 (1965)
382 U.S. 160 REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 537.
Decided November 22, 1965.
65 Wash. 2d 882, 400 P.2d 310, appeal dismissed.
DeWitt Williams for appellant.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
