BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST, 382 U.S. 106 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106 BURNHAM VAN SERVICE ET AL. v. PENTECOST ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 494.
Decided November 15, 1965.
Appeal dismissed.
J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106 ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 447.
Decided November 15, 1965.
241 F. Supp. 290, affirmed.
James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106 BURNHAM VAN SERVICE ET AL. v. PENTECOST ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 494.
Decided November 15, 1965.
Appeal dismissed.
J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 382 U.S. 106, 107
U.S. Supreme Court
ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106 ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 447.
Decided November 15, 1965.
241 F. Supp. 290, affirmed.
James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
