KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965)

381 U.S. 763

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437-440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent.

Page 381 U.S. 763, 1




U.S. Supreme Court

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965)

381 U.S. 763

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437-440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent.

Page 381 U.S. 763, 1

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.