FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965)

381 U.S. 762

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1024.
Decided June 7, 1965.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1025, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 339 F.2d 694.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Robert L. Russell and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 1024.

Herbert E. Squires and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioner in No. 1025.

J. P. Hammond, William J. Grove and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co., and Federal Power Comm'n v. Marr, ante, p. 392.

Page 381 U.S. 762, 763




U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965)

381 U.S. 762

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1024.
Decided June 7, 1965.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1025, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 339 F.2d 694.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Robert L. Russell and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 1024.

Herbert E. Squires and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioner in No. 1025.

J. P. Hammond, William J. Grove and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co., and Federal Power Comm'n v. Marr, ante, p. 392.

Page 381 U.S. 762, 763

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.