ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA, 381 U.S. 761 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA, 381 U.S. 761 (1965)

381 U.S. 761

ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS OF GREATER CHICAGO, INC., ET AL. v.
JEWEL TEA CO., INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 321.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 331 F.2d 547.

Eugene Kart for petitioners.

George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Theodore A. Groenke and Samuel Weisbard for respondent.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment below is reversed. Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, p. 676.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG concur in the judgment of the Court for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG'S opinion in United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington and Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, at 697.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissent.

Page 381 U.S. 761, 762




U.S. Supreme Court

ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA, 381 U.S. 761 (1965)

381 U.S. 761

ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS OF GREATER CHICAGO, INC., ET AL. v.
JEWEL TEA CO., INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 321.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 331 F.2d 547.

Eugene Kart for petitioners.

George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Theodore A. Groenke and Samuel Weisbard for respondent.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment below is reversed. Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, p. 676.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG concur in the judgment of the Court for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG'S opinion in United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington and Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, at 697.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissent.

Page 381 U.S. 761, 762

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.