AIR DISPATCH, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 412 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

AIR DISPATCH, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 412 (1965)

381 U.S. 412

AIR DISPATCH, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1004.
Decided June 1, 1965.

237 F. Supp. 450, affirmed.

Arthur R. Littleton, Harold S. Shertz, Louis P. Haffer and Robert M. Beckman for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al.; Robert J. Corber, Drew L. Carraway, John S. Fessenden, Peter T. Beardsley, Richard R. Sigmon and Bryce Rea, Jr., for National Association of Motor Bus Owners et al.; and Russell S. Bernhard for Air Cargo, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 381 U.S. 412, 413




U.S. Supreme Court

AIR DISPATCH, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 412 (1965)

381 U.S. 412

AIR DISPATCH, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1004.
Decided June 1, 1965.

237 F. Supp. 450, affirmed.

Arthur R. Littleton, Harold S. Shertz, Louis P. Haffer and Robert M. Beckman for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al.; Robert J. Corber, Drew L. Carraway, John S. Fessenden, Peter T. Beardsley, Richard R. Sigmon and Bryce Rea, Jr., for National Association of Motor Bus Owners et al.; and Russell S. Bernhard for Air Cargo, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 381 U.S. 412, 413

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.