KILLGORE v. BLACKWELL, 381 U.S. 278 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

KILLGORE v. BLACKWELL, 381 U.S. 278 (1965)

381 U.S. 278

KILLGORE v. BLACKWELL, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 363, Misc.
Decided May 17, 1965.*

[Footnote *] [REPORTER'S NOTE: This opinion is reported as amended on May 24, 1965.]

Certiorari granted, judgment reversed and case remanded.

Reported below: 332 F.2d 585.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania with instructions to reinstate petitioner's adult sentence of October 19, 1962, and release him in accordance with the terms of that sentence.

Page 381 U.S. 278, 279




U.S. Supreme Court

KILLGORE v. BLACKWELL, 381 U.S. 278 (1965)

381 U.S. 278

KILLGORE v. BLACKWELL, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 363, Misc.
Decided May 17, 1965.*

[Footnote *] [REPORTER'S NOTE: This opinion is reported as amended on May 24, 1965.]

Certiorari granted, judgment reversed and case remanded.

Reported below: 332 F.2d 585.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania with instructions to reinstate petitioner's adult sentence of October 19, 1962, and release him in accordance with the terms of that sentence.

Page 381 U.S. 278, 279

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.