SUSSER v. CARVEL CORP., 381 U.S. 125 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

SUSSER v. CARVEL CORP., 381 U.S. 125 (1965)

381 U.S. 125

SUSSER ET AL. v. CARVEL CORP. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 355.
Argued April 29, 1965.
Decided May 3, 1965.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 332 F.2d 505.

Arnold Fleischmann argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Sidney W. Rothstein and Robert G. Levy.

Herman L. Weisman and John A. Wilson argued the cause for respondents. With Mr. Weisman on the briefs for Carvel Corp. et al. were Herbert F. Roth and Lester G. Renard. With Mr. Wilson on the brief for H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., was Willard M. L. Robinson. Albert L. Wigor filed a brief for Eagle Cone Corp. William G. Mulligan and Doris Carroll filed a brief for Rakestraw's Dairy Products, Inc.

Jerrold G. Van Cise filed a brief for the International Franchise Association, Inc., as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 381 U.S. 125, 126

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SUSSER v. CARVEL CORP., 381 U.S. 125 (1965)

381 U.S. 125

SUSSER ET AL. v. CARVEL CORP. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 355.
Argued April 29, 1965.
Decided May 3, 1965.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 332 F.2d 505.

Arnold Fleischmann argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Sidney W. Rothstein and Robert G. Levy.

Herman L. Weisman and John A. Wilson argued the cause for respondents. With Mr. Weisman on the briefs for Carvel Corp. et al. were Herbert F. Roth and Lester G. Renard. With Mr. Wilson on the brief for H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., was Willard M. L. Robinson. Albert L. Wigor filed a brief for Eagle Cone Corp. William G. Mulligan and Doris Carroll filed a brief for Rakestraw's Dairy Products, Inc.

Jerrold G. Van Cise filed a brief for the International Franchise Association, Inc., as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 381 U.S. 125, 126

Oral Argument - April 29, 1965
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.