MURRAY v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 527 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

MURRAY v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 527 (1965)

380 U.S. 527

MURRAY v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 260, Misc.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 333 F.2d 409.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider the validity of the arrest of Henry Murray and of the search for and seizure of the money in question as an incident of such arrest.

Page 380 U.S. 527, 528

 


U.S. Supreme Court

MURRAY v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 527 (1965)

380 U.S. 527

MURRAY v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 260, Misc.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 333 F.2d 409.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider the validity of the arrest of Henry Murray and of the search for and seizure of the money in question as an incident of such arrest.

Page 380 U.S. 527, 528

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.