THOMAS v. MISSISSIPPI, 380 U.S. 524 (1965)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

THOMAS v. MISSISSIPPI, 380 U.S. 524 (1965)

380 U.S. 524

THOMAS ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 181.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgments reversed.

Reported below: See 248 Miss. 850, 160 So.2d 657, 161 So.2d 159, 521.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., Jack Young, R. Jess Brown, Carl Rachlin and Michael Meltsner for petitioners.

Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and John A. Travis and Robert G. Nichols, Jr., Special Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454, Abernathy v. Alabama, ante, p. 447.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 380 U.S. 524, 525




U.S. Supreme Court

THOMAS v. MISSISSIPPI, 380 U.S. 524 (1965)

380 U.S. 524

THOMAS ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 181.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgments reversed.

Reported below: See 248 Miss. 850, 160 So.2d 657, 161 So.2d 159, 521.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., Jack Young, R. Jess Brown, Carl Rachlin and Michael Meltsner for petitioners.

Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and John A. Travis and Robert G. Nichols, Jr., Special Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454, Abernathy v. Alabama, ante, p. 447.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 380 U.S. 524, 525

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.