CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION, 380 U.S. 521 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION, 380 U.S. 521 (1965) 380 U.S. 521

CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN, INC. v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.
No. 904.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 160 Me. 367, 205 A.2d 146.

Sidney W. Wernick for appellant.

Richard J. Dubord, Attorney General of Maine, George C. West, Deputy Attorney General, and John W. Benoit, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BROWN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/521/case.html">380 U.S. 521</a> (1965) 380 U.S. 521 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BROWN v. CALIFORNIA, 380 U.S. 521 (1965) 380 U.S. 521

BROWN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 194, Misc.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence R. Tapper, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 380 U.S. 521, 522

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION, 380 U.S. 521 (1965) 380 U.S. 521

CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN, INC. v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.
No. 904.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 160 Me. 367, 205 A.2d 146.

Sidney W. Wernick for appellant.

Richard J. Dubord, Attorney General of Maine, George C. West, Deputy Attorney General, and John W. Benoit, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BROWN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/521/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/521/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/521/">380 U.S. 521</a></a></a> (1965) 380 U.S. 521 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BROWN v. CALIFORNIA, 380 U.S. 521 (1965) 380 U.S. 521

BROWN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 194, Misc.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence R. Tapper, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 380 U.S. 521, 522

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.