BAKER v. ALASKA, 380 U.S. 260 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

BAKER v. ALASKA, 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260

BAKER ET AL., DBA BAKER & FORD v. ALASKA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 849.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 64 Wash. 2d 207, 390 P.2d 1009.

Bruce T. Rinker, Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES., <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/260/case.html">380 U.S. 260</a> (1965) 380 U.S. 260 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES., 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260

MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 397, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 333 F.2d 405.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to make findings with respect to petitioner's consent to the search.

Page 380 U.S. 260, 261

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BAKER v. ALASKA, 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260

BAKER ET AL., DBA BAKER & FORD v. ALASKA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 849.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 64 Wash. 2d 207, 390 P.2d 1009.

Bruce T. Rinker, Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES., <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/260/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/260/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/260/">380 U.S. 260</a></a></a> (1965) 380 U.S. 260 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES., 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260

MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 397, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 333 F.2d 405.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to make findings with respect to petitioner's consent to the search.

Page 380 U.S. 260, 261

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.