HALL v. ILLINOIS
380 U.S. 250 (1965)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HALL v. ILLINOIS, 380 U.S. 250 (1965)

380 U.S. 250

HALL v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 848, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 380 U.S. 250, 251

ARTHUR v. COLORADO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/250/case.html">380 U.S. 250</a> (1965) 380 U.S. 250 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARTHUR v. COLORADO, 380 U.S. 250 (1965)

380 U.S. 250

ARTHUR v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 486, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 155 Colo. 188, 393 P.2d 371.

Edward C. King for petitioner.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.