MADDOX v. BIRZGALIS, 380 U.S. 126 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
MADDOX v. BIRZGALIS, 380 U.S. 126 (1965) 380 U.S. 126 MADDOX v. BIRZGALIS, STATE HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 653, Misc.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
BONANNO v. LOUISIANA, 380 U.S. 126 (1965) 380 U.S. 126 BONANNO v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 728, Misc.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 245 La. 1117, 163 So. 2d 72.
Herbert J. Garon for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MADDOX v. BIRZGALIS, 380 U.S. 126 (1965) 380 U.S. 126 MADDOX v. BIRZGALIS, STATE HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 653, Misc.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
BONANNO v. LOUISIANA, 380 U.S. 126 (1965) 380 U.S. 126 BONANNO v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 728, Misc.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 245 La. 1117, 163 So. 2d 72.
Herbert J. Garon for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 380 U.S. 126, 127
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
