LIND v. MINNESOTA, 379 U.S. 9 (1964)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

LIND v. MINNESOTA, 379 U.S. 9 (1964) 379 U.S. 9

LIND v. MINNESOTA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 163, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston and Linus J. Hammond, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

LIND v. MINNESOTA, 379 U.S. 9 (1964) 379 U.S. 9 LIND v. MINNESOTA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 163, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston and Linus J. Hammond, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 379 U.S. 9, 10


379 U.S. 9 (1964) 379 U.S. 9 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, 379 U.S. 9 (1964) 379 U.S. 9 JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 260.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 175 Ohio St. 449, 196 N.E.2d 94.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

S. Noel Melvin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.