KATZENBACH v. MCCLUNG, 379 U.S. 802 (1964)
Annotation
U.S. Supreme Court
KATZENBACH v. MCCLUNG , 379 U.S. 802 (1964)
379 U.S. 802
Nicholas deB. KATZENBACH, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, et al., appellants,
v.
Ollie McCLUNG, Sr., et al.
No. 543.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 5, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Philip B. Heymann, Harold H. Greene and Gerald P. Choppin, for appellants.
Robert McD. Smith and William G. Somerville, for appellees.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr., for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., as amicus curiae.
T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State of North Carolina, as amicus curiae.
The motion of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. The joint motion to expedite briefing and oral argument is granted and the case is set for oral argument on Monday, October 5, 1964, immediately following No. 515.[ Katzenbach v. McClung 379 U.S. 802 (1964) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
KATZENBACH v. MCCLUNG , 379 U.S. 802 (1964)
Nicholas deB. KATZENBACH, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, et al., appellants,
v.
Ollie McCLUNG, Sr., et al.
No. 543.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 5, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Philip B. Heymann, Harold H. Greene and Gerald P. Choppin, for appellants.
Robert McD. Smith and William G. Somerville, for appellees.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr., for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., as amicus curiae.
T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State of North Carolina, as amicus curiae.
The motion of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. The joint motion to expedite briefing and oral argument is granted and the case is set for oral argument on Monday, October 5, 1964, immediately following No. 515.[ Katzenbach v. McClung 379 U.S. 802 (1964) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.