DENMAN v. WHITE, 379 U.S. 28 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
DENMAN v. WHITE, 379 U.S. 28 (1964) 379 U.S. 28 DENMAN ET UX. v. WHITE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 379, Misc.
Decided November 9, 1964.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
TRAUTWEIN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LOS ANGELES, 379 U.S. 28 (1964) 379 U.S. 28 TRAUTWEIN ET AL. v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 416.
Decided November 9, 1964.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 426, Goldman et ux. v. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles, also on appeal from the same court.
Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 61 Cal. 2d 21, 389 P.2d 538.
Frank Wickhem for appellants in No. 416.
Appellants pro se in No. 426.
Henry O. Duque for appellee in both cases.
Austin Clapp for John Swigart et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellants in No. 426.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of John Swigart et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 426 is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
DENMAN v. WHITE, 379 U.S. 28 (1964) 379 U.S. 28 DENMAN ET UX. v. WHITE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 379, Misc.
Decided November 9, 1964.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Page 379 U.S. 28, 29
U.S. Supreme Court
TRAUTWEIN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LOS ANGELES, 379 U.S. 28 (1964) 379 U.S. 28 TRAUTWEIN ET AL. v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 416.
Decided November 9, 1964.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 426, Goldman et ux. v. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles, also on appeal from the same court.
Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 61 Cal. 2d 21, 389 P.2d 538.
Frank Wickhem for appellants in No. 416.
Appellants pro se in No. 426.
Henry O. Duque for appellee in both cases.
Austin Clapp for John Swigart et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellants in No. 426.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of John Swigart et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 426 is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
