HOOPER v. DUNCAN
379 U.S. 27 (1964)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
HOOPER v. DUNCAN, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)
379 U.S. 27HOOPER v. DUNCAN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL
OF ARIZONA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. No. 393.
Decided November 9, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 95 Ariz. 305, 389 P.2d 706.
Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)
379 U.S. 27 ALBAUGH v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 481.
Decided November 9, 1964.
233 F. Supp. 576, affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.