HOOPER v. DUNCAN, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

HOOPER v. DUNCAN, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

379 U.S. 27

HOOPER v. DUNCAN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL
OF ARIZONA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. No. 393.
Decided November 9, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 95 Ariz. 305, 389 P.2d 706.

Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/27/case.html">379 U.S. 27</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 27 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

379 U.S. 27

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 481.
Decided November 9, 1964.

233 F. Supp. 576, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 379 U.S. 27, 28




U.S. Supreme Court

HOOPER v. DUNCAN, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

379 U.S. 27

HOOPER v. DUNCAN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL
OF ARIZONA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. No. 393.
Decided November 9, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 95 Ariz. 305, 389 P.2d 706.

Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/27/case.html">379 U.S. 27</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 27 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

379 U.S. 27

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 481.
Decided November 9, 1964.

233 F. Supp. 576, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 379 U.S. 27, 28

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.