CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., 379 U.S. 2 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., 379 U.S. 2 (1964) 379 U.S. 2 CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 72.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 156 So. 2d 842.
Carl A. Hiaasen for appellant.
William E. Miller and Robert J. Corber for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
DAVIS v. NEELY, 379 U.S. 2 (1964) 379 U.S. 2 DAVIS v. NEELY ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 68.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 387 P.2d 494.
John W. Willis for appellant.
Thomas D. Finney, Jr., and Grant W. Wiprud for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., 379 U.S. 2 (1964) 379 U.S. 2 CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 72.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 156 So. 2d 842.
Carl A. Hiaasen for appellant.
William E. Miller and Robert J. Corber for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 379 U.S. 2, 3
U.S. Supreme Court
DAVIS v. NEELY, 379 U.S. 2 (1964) 379 U.S. 2 DAVIS v. NEELY ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 68.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 387 P.2d 494.
John W. Willis for appellant.
Thomas D. Finney, Jr., and Grant W. Wiprud for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
