TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964)

379 U.S. 19

TANCIL ET AL. v. WOOLLS ET AL., JUDGES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 386.
Decided October 26, 1964.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 412, Virginia Board of Elections et al. v. Hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court.

230 F. Supp. 156, affirmed.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Page 379 U.S. 19, 20




U.S. Supreme Court

TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964)

379 U.S. 19

TANCIL ET AL. v. WOOLLS ET AL., JUDGES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 386.
Decided October 26, 1964.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 412, Virginia Board of Elections et al. v. Hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court.

230 F. Supp. 156, affirmed.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Page 379 U.S. 19, 20

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.