GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, 379 U.S. 18 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, 379 U.S. 18 (1964)

379 U.S. 18

GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 23.
Decided October 26, 1964.

Judgment reversed and case remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review.

Reported below: 308 F.2d 347.

Fred Okrand for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Philip R. Monahan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the submission of the United States that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review, and upon examination of the entire record, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to entertain the petition for review.

Page 379 U.S. 18, 19

 


U.S. Supreme Court

GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, 379 U.S. 18 (1964)

379 U.S. 18

GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 23.
Decided October 26, 1964.

Judgment reversed and case remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review.

Reported below: 308 F.2d 347.

Fred Okrand for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Philip R. Monahan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the submission of the United States that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review, and upon examination of the entire record, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to entertain the petition for review.

Page 379 U.S. 18, 19

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.