MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, 379 U.S. 17 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, 379 U.S. 17 (1964)

379 U.S. 17

MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 327.
Decided October 19, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 414 Pa. 294, 200 A. 2d 306.

Harry Alan Sherman for appellant.

David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker, Michael H. Gottesman and Ernest G. Nassar for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

Page 379 U.S. 17, 18




U.S. Supreme Court

MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, 379 U.S. 17 (1964)

379 U.S. 17

MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 327.
Decided October 19, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 414 Pa. 294, 200 A. 2d 306.

Harry Alan Sherman for appellant.

David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker, Michael H. Gottesman and Ernest G. Nassar for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

Page 379 U.S. 17, 18

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.