McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
379 U.S. 133 (1964)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, 379 U.S. 133 (1964)
379 U.S. 133 McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 472.
Decided November 23, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 61 Cal. 2d 186, 390 P.2d 412.
Walter L. Nossaman for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W. Low, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
