INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964)

379 U.S. 130

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.

324 F.2d 903, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman.

Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 379 U.S. 130, 131




U.S. Supreme Court

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964)

379 U.S. 130

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.

324 F.2d 903, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman.

Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 379 U.S. 130, 131

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.