ETCHIESON v. TEXAS, 378 U.S. 589 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

ETCHIESON v. TEXAS, 378 U.S. 589 (1964)

378 U.S. 589

ETCHIESON v. TEXAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS. No. 1050, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 372 S.W.2d 690.

Clyde W. Woody for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for consideration in light of Aguilar v. Texas, ante, p. 108.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Aguilar v. Texas.

Page 378 U.S. 589, 1

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ETCHIESON v. TEXAS, 378 U.S. 589 (1964)

378 U.S. 589

ETCHIESON v. TEXAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS. No. 1050, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 372 S.W.2d 690.

Clyde W. Woody for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for consideration in light of Aguilar v. Texas, ante, p. 108.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Aguilar v. Texas.

Page 378 U.S. 589, 1

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.