COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 378 U.S. 588 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 378 U.S. 588 (1964)
378 U.S. 588 COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1041, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Judgment vacated and case remanded.
Reported below: 226 F. Supp. 20.
Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment.
U.S. Supreme Court
COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 378 U.S. 588 (1964)
378 U.S. 588 COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1041, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Judgment vacated and case remanded.
Reported below: 226 F. Supp. 20.
Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment.
Page 378 U.S. 588, 589
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.