INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC. v. WASHINGTON, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC. v. WASHINGTON, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

378 U.S. 580

INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 849.
Decided June 22, 1964.*

Appeals dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 619, 384 P.2d 337.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 850, Hebb & Narodick Construction Co., Inc., et al. v. Washington et al., and No. 851, Murray et al. v. Washington et al., both also on appeal from the same court.

Seth W. Morrison for appellants in No. 849.

T. M. Royce for appellants in No. 850.

Edward G. Dobrin for appellants in No. 851.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, John W. Riley and Timothy R. Malone, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and James A. Furber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I. Henry Kutz filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 378 U.S. 580, 581

 


U.S. Supreme Court

INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC. v. WASHINGTON, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

378 U.S. 580

INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 849.
Decided June 22, 1964.*

Appeals dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 619, 384 P.2d 337.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 850, Hebb & Narodick Construction Co., Inc., et al. v. Washington et al., and No. 851, Murray et al. v. Washington et al., both also on appeal from the same court.

Seth W. Morrison for appellants in No. 849.

T. M. Royce for appellants in No. 850.

Edward G. Dobrin for appellants in No. 851.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, John W. Riley and Timothy R. Malone, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and James A. Furber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I. Henry Kutz filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 378 U.S. 580, 581

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.