FRIED v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 578 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

FRIED v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 578 (1964)

378 U.S. 578

FRIED v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 330.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 18 App. Div. 2d 996, 238 N.Y.S.2d 742.

Herbert Monte Levy for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the judgment reversed.

Page 378 U.S. 578, 579

 


U.S. Supreme Court

FRIED v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 578 (1964)

378 U.S. 578

FRIED v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 330.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 18 App. Div. 2d 996, 238 N.Y.S.2d 742.

Herbert Monte Levy for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the judgment reversed.

Page 378 U.S. 578, 579

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.