McNERLIN v. DENNO, 378 U.S. 575 (1964)
McNERLIN v. DENNO, WARDEN. U.S. Supreme Court
McNERLIN v. DENNO, 378 U.S. 575 (1964)
378 U.S. 575
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1117, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 324 F.2d 46.
Richard J. Medalie for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
U.S. Supreme Court
McNERLIN v. DENNO, 378 U.S. 575 (1964)
378 U.S. 575 McNERLIN v. DENNO, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1117, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 324 F.2d 46.
Richard J. Medalie for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Page 378 U.S. 575, 576
