MUSCHETTE v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 569 (1964)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

MUSCHETTE v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 569 (1964) 378 U.S. 569

MUSCHETTE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 729, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 116 U.S. App. D.C. 239, 322 F.2d 989.

Alfred L. Scanlan for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 569, 570

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

MUSCHETTE v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 569 (1964) 378 U.S. 569 MUSCHETTE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 729, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 116 U.S. App. D.C. 239, 322 F.2d 989.

Alfred L. Scanlan for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 569, 570