LUCAS v. ADAMS, 378 U.S. 555 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

LUCAS v. ADAMS, 378 U.S. 555 (1964)

378 U.S. 555

LUCAS ET AL. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 559.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Affirmed.

Releford McGriff for appellants.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, and Wilton R. Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 378 U.S. 555, 556

 


U.S. Supreme Court

LUCAS v. ADAMS, 378 U.S. 555 (1964)

378 U.S. 555

LUCAS ET AL. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 559.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Affirmed.

Releford McGriff for appellants.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, and Wilton R. Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 378 U.S. 555, 556

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.