WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964)

378 U.S. 548

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 4.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 N.C. 804, 117 S. E. 2d 824.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and Conrad J. Lynn for petitioner.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in light of Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 548, 549




U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964)

378 U.S. 548

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 4.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 N.C. 804, 117 S. E. 2d 824.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and Conrad J. Lynn for petitioner.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in light of Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 548, 549

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.