DREWS v. MARYLAND, 378 U.S. 547 (1964)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

DREWS v. MARYLAND, 378 U.S. 547 (1964)

378 U.S. 547

DREWS ET AL. v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 3.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 224 Md. 186, 167 A.2d 341.

Robert B. Watts, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. and Jack Greenberg for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Maryland for consideration in light of Griffin v. Maryland, ante, p. 130, and Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 547, 548

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DREWS v. MARYLAND, 378 U.S. 547 (1964)

378 U.S. 547

DREWS ET AL. v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 3.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 224 Md. 186, 167 A.2d 341.

Robert B. Watts, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. and Jack Greenberg for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Maryland for consideration in light of Griffin v. Maryland, ante, p. 130, and Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 547, 548

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.