DRESNER v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, 378 U.S. 539 (1964)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

DRESNER v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, 378 U.S. 539 (1964)

378 U.S. 539

DRESNER ET AL. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA, SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
No. 35.
Argued October 23, 1963. Questions certified to Supreme Court of Florida December 2, 1963.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Alfred I. Hopkins and Tobias Simon.

Edward J. Hill and Roy T. Rhodes argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Rivers Buford, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

The questions which this Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida, 375 U.S. 136, having been answered in the affirmative, 164 So. 2d 208, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. 28 U.S.C. 1257.

Page 378 U.S. 539, 540

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DRESNER v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, 378 U.S. 539 (1964)

378 U.S. 539

DRESNER ET AL. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA, SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
No. 35.
Argued October 23, 1963. Questions certified to Supreme Court of Florida December 2, 1963.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Alfred I. Hopkins and Tobias Simon.

Edward J. Hill and Roy T. Rhodes argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Rivers Buford, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

The questions which this Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida, 375 U.S. 136, having been answered in the affirmative, 164 So. 2d 208, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. 28 U.S.C. 1257.

Page 378 U.S. 539, 540

Oral Argument - October 23, 1963
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.